From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8c54bb73b6fd8d22 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) Subject: Re: GDB Woes Continued: language related ? Date: 1998/02/10 Message-ID: <6bocee$lql$1@news.nyu.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 323607367 References: <01bd333c$4fb8b000$452c5c8b@aptiva> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 887076110 22357 (None) 128.122.140.194 Organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-02-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article rracine@draper.com (Roger Racine) writes: >Yes, but I have what I am told is a rare version: Windows 3.1 => Windows >95 Upgrade that I bought in a store. This version is supposedly fraught >with peril for gdb. Download and install the "Service release 1" and some of its bugfixes from Microsoft and install. That's a worthwhile thing to do anyway and I've run GDB on such a system with no problem. BTW, the problem isn't GDB per se, but the Borland C runtime that is used by the TK and TCL DLLs that it uses.