From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d44726544972ff65
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: rlove@antispam.neosoft.com (Robert B. Love )
Subject: Re: GNAT 3.10p and GCC 2.7.2.3
Date: 1998/02/10
Message-ID: <6bo8ef$dg9$1@uuneo.neosoft.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 323591436
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6bguq9$rjh$2@uuneo.neosoft.com> <87ra5f1pm6.fsf@darkstar.maison>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: NeoSoft, Inc.  
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-02-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In <87ra5f1pm6.fsf@darkstar.maison> Jean-Francois Vilarem wrote:
> rlove@antispam.neosoft.com (Robert B. Love ) writes:
> 
> > I've just upgraded my Linux to RedHat 5 and seem to have lost my
> > ability to compile.  I believe that my gcc got upgraded to 2.7.2.3.
> > What gcc was gnat-3.10p built with?  Is there a compatibility problem
> > with it and the newer gcc?
> Binaries from gnat-3.10p.....tar.gz are built using gcc-2.7.2.1 and 
libc.so.5
> This installation overwrite /usr/bin/gcc and does not work.
> 
> I have found a dirty trick :  use the package gnat-3.10 from 
debian/hamm/devel
> This package is compiled with glibc2.0, gcc-2.7.2.3 and does not divert 
gcc.
 
[ procedure deleted ]

I followed it and sure enough I can now compile.  However, the
program core dumps when I try to execute it. 

Will ACT build GNAT 3.10p with gcc 2.7.2.3?  If I get the source,
how difficult is it to do yourself?

----------------------------------------------------------------
 Bob Love                                   MIME & NeXT Mail OK
 rlove@neosoft.com                            PGP key available
----------------------------------------------------------------