From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,456376b2ea79556
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: lehman@ida.org (Dan Lehman)
Subject: Re: Exception on System.Max_Digits
Date: 1998/02/05
Message-ID: <6bdcct$818@news.ida.org>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 322427873
Organization: IDA, Alexandria, Virginia
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-02-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


> The ACVC certainly tests for this

Not so certainly at all--l00k and show us where?!

There seem to be no specific Float_IO tests that use large numerals
--they're not really so keen on that aspect of conformity, rather
simply checking that things are in place (so, small, easy model
numbers get used--occasionally non-model #s, too, which show up
on disputes! :-).

The only case of longggg numerals that I have found is in tests
that check for exact representations of 'Large/'Small (though one
might expect the bogus argument about too many numerals to be
offered there as well :-).

---Dan
------- *