From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5f5a48f21d7f7525,start
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Inferring array index type from array object
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <6b20ed09-efc1-4df7-90f9-5e141482e8d0@d37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.138.182.236
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1277278223 12474 127.0.0.1 (23 Jun 2010 07:30:23
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 07:30:23 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: d37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.138.182.236;
	posting-account=bMuEOQoAAACUUr_ghL3RBIi5neBZ5w_S
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11878
Date: 2010-06-23T00:30:23-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Consider this:

S : String := "Hello";

It is possible to iterate over all indices of this array with this
construct:

for I in S'Range loop ...

I would like to declare I as a free variable instead and I would
expect some symmetry in the language by doing this:

I : S'Range := S'First;

But it does not work. Of course, one can do:

I : Positive := S'First;

But it has the disadvantage of hardcoding the index type and
introducing unnecessary coupling in the code.
(hint: the problem is not really about Strings, it is a general array
question)

I have two questions:

1. What is the standard justification for this assymetry? What exactly
makes S'Range "work" in a for loop?

2. Is it possible to declare the index variable without hardcoding the
index type (that is, to infer it from the array object)?

--
Maciej Sobczak * http://www.inspirel.com

YAMI4 - Messaging Solution for Distributed Systems
http://www.inspirel.com/yami4