From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2a17785321e80884 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: nospam@somewhere.ia.us (Robert S. White) Subject: Re: Redundant With Remover Date: 1998/02/01 Message-ID: <6b0jqr$9h42@odie.mcleod.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 320967178 References: <886175452.1936588810@dejanews.com> <34D32B8E.F86335E1@elca-matrix.ch> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII Organization: ... Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-02-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <34D32B8E.F86335E1@elca-matrix.ch>, Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch says... > >> Does anybody know of a utility that can check for unneccessary with'd >> packages? Obviously it would be harder to spot for packages that are also >> use'd, but if the utility also looks at the with'd package to see if >> anything is actually used, it could be done. > >gnatf (part of the GNAT compiler) does that. Rational APEX will also when you hit the "Show Unused" button. _____________________________________________________________________ Robert S. White -- An embedded systems software engineer e-mail reply to reverse of ( add .'s ): net mcleodusa shift2 r white