From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ba714c9432667bbd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dweller@universe.digex.net (David  Weller)
Subject: Re: Ada to Buhr
Date: 1998/01/28
Message-ID: <6ansnq$b50@universe.digex.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 320026613
References: <JDEHHGAvDkz0EwRy@dowie-cs.demon.co.uk>
Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-01-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <JDEHHGAvDkz0EwRy@dowie-cs.demon.co.uk>,
Martin M Dowie  <martin@dowie-cs.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>Does anyone know of a reverse engineering tool to convert existing Ada
>(83) code into a Buhr notation diagram (approx 300 packages). we've
>tried the 'a_reveng' tool that comes with TeamWork (v7) but the result
>are not exactly readable...
>-- 

Hmm, some of us would claim that even IF a tool reverse-engineered
those 300 packages, the resulting Buhr notation would still be
unreadable :-)

Why would you want to convert 300 packages of old Adainto 300 diagrams
(generally) of an old notation?  If you simply want to see
dependencies, there's a LOT of simple tools out there that will
provide you that info.

-- 
   ******   NEW!!  DoD Ada Hotline Number:  1-800-PARIAH    ******
Tired of "junk" e-mail?  Write to your congressman and tell them you support
H.R. 1748, "The Netizens Protection Act of 1997".  Make those SPAM-roaches run!             http://www.cauce.org          TAKE BACK THE INTERNET!