From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10891a,6c32e094b6d41840
X-Google-Attributes: gid10891a,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6c32e094b6d41840
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Subject: Re: gdb not working
Date: 1998/01/27
Message-ID: <6ajeas$ef7$1@news.nyu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 319529674
References: <6afue2$vhf$1@Masala.CC.UH.EDU> <6ag5u7$ta2$1@news.nyu.edu>
 <6ah606$3t5$1@Masala.CC.UH.EDU>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.nyu.edu
X-Trace: news.nyu.edu 885865628 14823 (None) 128.122.140.194
Organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date: 1998-01-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <6ah606$3t5$1@Masala.CC.UH.EDU> wanker@exploited.barmy.army writes:
>Hmmmmm, was it called gdb or any variation on the name because
>I could find NOTHING.  I suppose it's possible that my installation
>somehow screwed up -- I picked "standard" installation from the
>install wizard, maybe that had somethign to do with it.

There was indeed one version of GNAT where the "typical" selection
erroneously didn't include GDB (you can get it via the "custom"
selection); it might well have been 3.09.