From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,35f6cee6f665d64b
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.220.230 with SMTP id pz6mr1806451pbc.3.1343570818503;
        Sun, 29 Jul 2012 07:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 c10ni49065pbw.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Ada novice <shai.lesh@gmx.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ANN: Ada 2005 Math Extensions 20120712
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 07:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <6ae0b4cc-5ef1-43c0-b93a-8d33408f1a77@googlegroups.com>
References: <m2k3y8ydap.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
 <167ecede-3588-45f0-904b-06a8be4cfec7@googlegroups.com>
 <m24npay65y.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
 <2ba72d4e-6e88-4900-8232-c075242dec1f@googlegroups.com>
 <65f76f80-a1e5-4c60-8002-45becc2a1198@googlegroups.com>
 <m2mx2kq5me.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
 <e1d5d31c-f873-4910-8bf3-6700a17007d1@googlegroups.com>
 <m2ehnvpto3.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.11.21.204
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1343570818 3950 127.0.0.1 (29 Jul 2012 14:06:58
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:06:58 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <m2ehnvpto3.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=193.11.21.204;
 posting-account=Rr9I-QoAAACS-nOzpA-mGxtAlZ46Nb6I
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2012-07-29T07:05:36-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Saturday, July 28, 2012 8:33:32 PM UTC+1, Simon Wright wrote:
=20
> I'm not a numerical analyst, so I have no idea whether these differences
>=20
> represent bugs or features.

I've read that ACML is developed with NAG and so getting different results =
was perhaps not something to be expected. Eigenvectors are tricky as they c=
ould be normalised or not and different normalisation schemes exist. Someth=
ing would have been terribly wrong had the eigenvalues were different!

YC