From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c21af9a0f87d174a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jhopper@erinet.com (James Hopper)
Subject: Re: ROBERT DEWER, Chill out...
Date: 1998/01/24
Message-ID: <6abtgv$jf3@nntp1.erinet.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 318779159
Sender: -Not-Authenticated-[5490]
References: <69jftk$b97@mtinsc02.worldnet.att.net>
 <34c6562c.1661335@news.mersinet.co.uk> <dewar.885449413@merv>
 <dewar.885451526@merv>  <34C88745.CEDE4773@avicom.net>
XDisclaimer: User not authenticated
Organization: EriNet Online 937 436-1700 (Voice)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-01-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <34C88745.CEDE4773@avicom.net>
Thornton <thornton@AVICOM.NET> writes:

> There's no doubt you're highly educated & intelligent in regards to the
> topics discussed on this newsgroups, but I second the motion that you're
> also quite rude.

I will also jump to roberts defense also.  I have worked with Robert a
bit the last few years and i have several times taken offense a bit at
things he said over email or on cla.  But i am a bit more direct, in
that i always privately ask him if my perception of the event is what
he really intended (well i wasnt ALWAYS that polite about it). he
always seemed taken quite aback that i had taken it that way, and has
always been good to help me understand that he was not being
disrespectful of me or rude.  I have come to understand roberts way of
doing email, and have benefited a great deal from the association since
i got over letting my feelings be mussed by MY perception of his tone.

jim