From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,ed1f7204771ad6dd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Jean-Pierre Rosen" Subject: Re: Other implementations of pragma Abort_Defer? Date: 1998/01/23 Message-ID: <6aa95k$pou$1@peuplier.wanadoo.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 318606467 References: <6a91ej$e1n$1@uuneo.neosoft.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Organization: Adalog Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-01-23T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Pat Rogers a �crit dans le message <6a91ej$e1n$1@uuneo.neosoft.com>... >I'm curious how many other implementations have also provided something >similar to GNAT's pragma Abort_Defer. Although I think the parts of the >name are backward (i.e. I would have thought it would be Defer_Abort, if not >Abort_Deferred) it is a much lighter mechanism than an otherwise unnecessary >protected type. Any info?? > You don't need a special pragma to defer abortion, it can be done in a 100% portable way. I have a package that allows you to protect a call to a procedure from abortion. I plan to put it on Adalog's web site as soon as I find the time to write the documentation... In the meantime, I can send it to anyone interested.