From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2bd8ac4fbddfd5da
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Container Library recommendations?
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:44:34 +0200
Message-ID: <6aa0jiF37e918U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <byi%j.5527$Ri.596@flpi146.ffdc.sbc.com>
 <70E%j.185652$yE1.2910@attbi_s21>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: individual.net zYvpkdDuwt8MIY5A120OrA5nJgD/ol4dxSCdbiL1dWJbAe3Mc=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cYym1YAov+y0tGRt/6vpIzK6Ojo=
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:467
Date: 2008-05-30T11:44:34+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jeffrey R. Carter wrote:

> Dimonax wrote:
>> 
>> What Ada libraries, that are in common use, would you recommend are best
>> suited to Concurrent programming? I intend to keep the "core" of my
>> applications well seperated from any dependencies on the host platform.
>> Nonetheless I'm aware of the fact that different libraries are better
>> suited to different platforms when concurrency is involved.
> 
> The PragmAda Reusable Components contain a number of protected data
> structures and other concurrency-related components such as task decouplers
> and safe semaphores.
> 
> http://pragmada.home.mchsi.com/
> 
> Note that the PragmARCs are Ada 95 and use private types in ways that are
> prohibited by the current standard.

I'm curious about these now-prohibited ways. If you have the time to give some
example it would be great.

Thanks!