From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ed1f7204771ad6dd,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Pat Rogers" <progers@acm.org>
Subject: Other implementations of pragma Abort_Defer?
Date: 1998/01/22
Message-ID: <6a91ej$e1n$1@uuneo.neosoft.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 318490085
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Organization: NeoSoft, Inc.  
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-01-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


I'm curious how many other implementations have also provided something
similar to GNAT's pragma Abort_Defer.  Although I think the parts of the
name are backward (i.e. I would have thought it would be Defer_Abort, if not
Abort_Deferred) it is a much lighter mechanism than an otherwise unnecessary
protected type.  Any info??