From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6b1f8557c1f43dcd,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-19 15:35:37 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: tony_gair@yahoo.co.uk (Tony Gair)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: sequential io and variant records
Date: 19 Mar 2003 15:35:37 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <6a90b886.0303191535.6c92aa0a@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.92.194.13
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1048116937 1266 127.0.0.1 (19 Mar 2003 23:35:37
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Mar 2003 23:35:37 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:35535
Date: 2003-03-19T23:35:37+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I was surprised to notice that I could compile and link the generic
package sequential_io with a variant record as a parameter.

I was wondering if anyone has experimented to see how variant these
records could be when used in conjunction with such a package.

Examples eagerly accepted.....