From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,11a62e323672426b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-14 05:39:17 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: okellogg@freenet.de (Oliver Kellogg) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT bending signal handlers Date: 14 May 2003 05:39:17 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <6a6390b8.0305140439.61b00850@posting.google.com> References: <6a6390b8.0305120129.24683c2b@posting.google.com> <3EBFDAB9.441F858D@raytheon.com> <6a6390b8.0305130305.13dfc423@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 53.122.197.194 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1052915957 13077 127.0.0.1 (14 May 2003 12:39:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 May 2003 12:39:17 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37319 Date: 2003-05-14T12:39:17+00:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff wrote in message news:... > > GNAT supports a pragma Unreserve_All_Interrupts, which I found to be > necessary when I wanted to handle SIGINT. I don't know if that's > related to your problem... Great! That did the trick. Many thanks. --Oliver