From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2afac1a4161c7f35 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: brashear@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us (Philip Brashear) Subject: Re: Distinguishing type names from other identifiers Date: 1998/01/21 Message-ID: <6a4pho$h4n@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 317983091 References: <884736089.2104295427@dejanews.com> <01bd2207$18f3fac0$95fc82c1@xhv46.dial.pipex.com> <69nt40$q7n@top.mitre.org> Organization: None Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-01-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <69nt40$q7n@top.mitre.org>, Michael F Brenner wrote: > > ... everyone should agree ... > >Dr. Dewar, it is obvious that EVERYONE does not agree with you that Ahem! Actually "EVERYONE does not agree with [Robert Dewar]" is a false statement, since there are people who do agree with him. Perhaps Michael meant "NOT everyone agrees with [Robert Dewar]". One might take this as an example of attention to readability, I suppose. (:-) Phil Brashear