From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4b3c1a8f7db90f9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!q26g2000prq.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Ivan Levashew <octagram@bluebottle.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Interfaces and abstract tagged types
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <6a44b25e-07c7-4b3f-9e22-08a778073e4a@q26g2000prq.googlegroups.com>
References: <MrNoSpam-2E36C8.18013105102008@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
	<1w8x4i0peinwk$.16cenhvch5kv5.dlg@40tude.net>
 <wcc63o623bj.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
	<mshb6m8vcpzn$.17hq7rvpyycxb.dlg@40tude.net>
 <c83a1b3b-298f-4aa3-9974-aa7b8153dc15@c22g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
	<d8k5v0eh9lhg.1ip39ui01oj9h.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 92.125.93.90
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1224149026 27854 127.0.0.1 (16 Oct 2008 09:23:46
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:23:46 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: q26g2000prq.googlegroups.com; posting-host=92.125.93.90;
	posting-account=SWSr0goAAABcqpu6T_j1x1_Ub5y2Ekfy
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru; rv:1.9.0.3)
	Gecko/2008092417 Firefox/3.0.3,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2409
Date: 2008-10-16T02:23:46-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> Maybe, because I am right? (:-))

As for me, it's because it takes much time to get how to use every of
3 cases.

> reality. As I described in my
> previous post, we have a growing amount of code
> that is just noise.

>   type A_Interface is limited interface;
>   procedure Foo (X : A) is abstract;
>   type A is abstract ... and A_Interface with ...;
>   overriding procedure Foo (X : A);

A code duplication ratio is expected to be
between 2:1 and 3:1. Is it noise? Did your team
use generic mix-ins?