From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f822ae7b0f7433c1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s72.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: Jeffrey Carter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060130 SeaMonkey/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Translating an embedded C algorithm References: <1168871816.263502.212100@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <6Pdrh.353753$1i1.119670@attbi_s72> NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.201.97.213 X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com X-Trace: attbi_s72 1168992578 12.201.97.213 (Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:09:38 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:09:38 GMT Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:09:38 GMT Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8210 Date: 2007-01-17T00:09:38+00:00 List-Id: Cesar Rabak wrote: > > Yes. When building embedded systems, is it very rare that 'portability' > be on the top of any requirements list. Many of the Ada RT embedded systems I've worked on have been ported to new hardware or compilers, fairly easily, since I tend to avoid (RT)OS and compiler dependencies, and to encapsulate and hide them when unavoidable. > Two mistakes don't make a good result! I see. Pointing out a mistake is a mistake. I didn't realize that.