From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2a2f58d5fc3c0285 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-09 19:19:23 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!4.1.16.34!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT/GCC 3.0? Date: 9 Aug 2001 21:19:18 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: <6BbNZYxtKoM8@eisner.encompasserve.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 997409461 371 192.135.80.34 (10 Aug 2001 02:11:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 02:11:01 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11735 Date: 2001-08-09T21:19:18-05:00 List-Id: In article , writes: > A while back I read something about GCC including gnat in the main gcc > tree. Has anyone heard about the plans to include it in gcc recently? Yes, I have read about it in this newsgroup within the past two weeks. I don't remember the details, but you could check an archive.