From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ec9c2faf505e5d4a,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 103b8b,ec9c2faf505e5d4a,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103b8b,public
From: johnjohn@triceratops.com
Subject: GNU Emacs ada-mode: colors in X
Date: 1998/01/19
Message-ID: <69v6kt$kup$1@madmax.keyway.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 317509254
Organization: Keyway Internet Access 909-933-3650
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.emacs.help
Date: 1998-01-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


I've been writing code for a brief time on two platforms:

Sparc 20 + Solaris 2.5.1 + GNAT
PC compatible + RedHat Linux 4.2 + GNAT

On the RedHat box, I noticed that the version of Emacs I'm using
(19.34 from the RedHat provided RPM), the ada-mode doesn't colorize
the source code.  On the Sparc, it did.

In case it matters, I looked up the lisp file, and here are the
headers:

;;; compiled by rms@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu on Thu Feb  1 23:45:08 1996
;;; from file /home/fsf/rms/e19/lisp/ada-mode.el
;;; emacs version 19.30.90.5.
;;; bytecomp version FSF 2.10
;;; optimization is on.
;;; this file uses opcodes which do not exist in Emacs 18.

Is there an update to this file that I should have?  Or is there
some kind of configuration that I've neglected to do?


Any help is appreciateed.  Thanks!

John