From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8985766beca53c7c,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Pat Rogers" <progers@acm.org>
Subject: if you ever complained about the signal/noise ratio
Date: 1998/01/15
Message-ID: <69mc65$t5g$1@uuneo.neosoft.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 316389785
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
Organization: NeoSoft, Inc.  
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-01-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


If you've ever complained about the signal/noise ration on c.l.a, how about
looking at my posted question with subject reading "statically compatible
access discriminants in derivation"?    It is pure signal... :)


pat rogers
progers@acm.org