From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1 Date: 31 Jul 93 21:53:06 GMT From: alex@MIMSY.CS.UMD.EDU (Alex Blakemore) Subject: Re: Unknown Pragmas in Ada 9X Message-ID: <69853@mimsy.umd.edu> List-Id: In article <236r5q$m7e@usafa2.usafa.af.mil> cwarack@kirk.usafa.af.mil (Chris Wa rack ) writes: > Furthermore, for the ASIS people. Does the ASIS standard under > discussion imply that pragmas unsupported by the compiler will be > "supported" by ASIS? (I.e., ASIS packages will be able to process > pragmas even though the compiler ignores them...) the ASIS spec has a place for unknown pragmas, but I dont know if the latest spec _requires_ that they be preserved. I know an earlier implementatio n ignored them. we should check this. btw, it would be good to mail things like this to asis@stars.reston.paramax.com so they are brought to the attention of the people working on and using the sta ndard. -- Alex Blakemore alex@cs.umd.edu NeXT mail accepted -------------------------------------------------------------- "Without an engaged and motivated human being at the keyboard, the computer is just another dumb box." William Raspberry