From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!lll-lcc!ncis.tis.llnl.gov!lll-winken!uunet!mcvax!tuvie!brock
From: brock@tuvie (Inst.f.Prakt.Info 1802)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Question on Abstract Syntax Tree
Message-ID: <697@tuvie>
Date: 9 May 89 16:08:30 GMT
Reply-To: ulrich@vip.UUCP (Ulrich Neumerkel)
Organization: Technical University of Vienna, EDP-Center
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I have a question concerning the abstract syntax tree in ADA:
Is it part of the standard, or standardized anywhere?
Can You give me some references about work on it? I believe there
has been some description language called Diana

Thanks in advance Ulrich

(Ulrich Neumerkel ulrich@vip.at  ...!mcvax!tuvie!vip!ulrich)