From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.36.36.138 with SMTP id f132mr754263ita.3.1466811933070;
        Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.157.11.173 with SMTP id 42mr160877oth.10.1466772571844; Fri,
 24 Jun 2016 05:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.fcku.it!peer01.fr7!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!jk6no342967igb.0!news-out.google.com!i62ni1840ith.0!nntp.google.com!jk6no342961igb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <dt2dvnFdi0mU1@mid.individual.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=198.135.236.252;
 posting-account=ENgozAkAAACH-stq5yXctoDQeZQP2E6J
NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.135.236.252
References: <66c14298-c62d-4f4b-b0c0-e969454f9334@googlegroups.com>
 <2e39857a-7121-476b-807a-d2bff1e598f4@googlegroups.com>
 <431af616-7df3-4e4d-9262-26ed68cb74c7@googlegroups.com>
 <037df2b8-b9c4-4447-87ee-cc89d7072b30@googlegroups.com>
 <lyinx5n5vk.fsf@pushface.org>
 <15914c54-191c-4f37-b754-282855d1aeaf@googlegroups.com>
 <nk6qb1$8k4$2@gioia.aioe.org>
 <a4e0e20a-5e94-49c9-922e-5aa12582cb2c@googlegroups.com>
 <nk6vma$gfp$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <fcef381c-b0c0-4c53-9b99-012b7442a532@googlegroups.com>
 <nk85pq$1qpj$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <3e25c9a0-469c-4487-b78e-6f87434f87fa@googlegroups.com>
 <dsqunpFsobrU1@mid.individual.net>
 <2e69ca6f-484c-4d58-b0fe-d17a744b1418@googlegroups.com>
 <dss31fF4s56U1@mid.individual.net>
 <9ada1cdc-2fbd-4009-99f1-aba71ac1b9d2@googlegroups.com>
 <dstqerFg2ooU1@mid.individual.net>
 <2954ae98-c4a0-4089-93bc-97854e009785@googlegroups.com>
 <dt1kcmF8cgsU1@mid.individual.net>
 <581cb97c-9d81-4a81-9a05-eed0516ce287@googlegroups.com>
 <dt2dvnFdi0mU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <689e8b26-3ece-4d72-8992-d42b04fab3b4@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Generic Embedded List Nodes
From: Warren <ve3wwg@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:45:33 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Body-CRC: 378676054
X-Received-Bytes: 2941
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:30909
Date: 2016-06-24T05:49:31-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, 23 June 2016 11:36:25 UTC-4, Niklas Holsti  wrote:
> My example had two embedded list nodes in the object, so the object=20
> could be a member of two lists. You can define as many nodes as you=20
> like, in the same record type, at the same time.

Sorry, yes I see it now.

>  type Integer_Object_T;=20
>
>    type Integer_Emb_Node_T (Obj : access Integer_Object_T)=20
 >   is new Emb_Node_T with null record;=20

I think when I had tried to do this, I had the chicken and egg problem. But=
 I see you used the forward undefined type mechanism. I may explore this fu=
rther at some point-- it certainly seems to solve the problem as I laid it =
out.  I just need to find some quiet time. Thanks for the help.

Warren