From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mmintl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka
From: franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams)
Newsgroups: net.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Mutually Recursive Data-Structures in ADA
Message-ID: <687@mmintl.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 23-Sep-85 19:30:36 EDT
Article-I.D.: mmintl.687
Posted: Mon Sep 23 19:30:36 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 27-Sep-85 06:35:43 EDT
References: <8509200232.AA03222@UCB-VAX.ARPA>
Reply-To: franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams)
Organization: Multimate International, E. Hartford, CT
Summary: put the access functions in a separate package
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


[Not food]

One possibility would be to remove the access functions from the packages
for the types, and put them in a separate package of their own.  I know this
isn't ideal, but it may be better than the alternatives.

Sorry to send this on the news, but mail didn't make it.

Frank Adams                           ihpn4!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka
Multimate International    52 Oakland Ave North    E. Hartford, CT 06108