From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10a146,a03ae7f4e53958e1 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a146,public X-Google-Thread: fac41,a03ae7f4e53958e1 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,8775b19e3c68a5dc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,a03ae7f4e53958e1 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,a03ae7f4e53958e1 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,a03ae7f4e53958e1 X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public X-Google-Thread: fa0ae,a03ae7f4e53958e1 X-Google-Attributes: gidfa0ae,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,a03ae7f4e53958e1 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public From: watzka@stat.uni-muenchen.de (Kurt Watzka) Subject: Re: Which language pays most 17457 -- C++ vs. Java? Date: 1997/12/22 Message-ID: <67l6kk$m7k$1@sparcserver.lrz-muenchen.de>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 309268512 Distribution: world References: <199712121931.LAA25389@sirius.infonex.com> <349B0417.D4DB6A30@its.cl> <67gvpa$m3t$1@brie.direct.ca> <67iipp$ktj$1@darla.visi.com> <882756127snz@genesis.demon.co.uk> Organization: Institut fuer Statistik der LMU Muenchen (Germany) Reply-To: watzka@stat.uni-muenchen.de Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.ada,comp.edu Date: 1997-12-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: fred@genesis.demon.co.uk (Lawrence Kirby) writes: >In article <67iipp$ktj$1@darla.visi.com> > seebs@plethora.net "Peter Seebach" writes: >>In article , >>William J. Leary Jr. wrote: >>>Not that I've ever noticed. I frequently use C compilers to target embedded >>>systems. >> >>Then you're using "freestanding environments", which are a separate language. >>The library is, indeed, part of the hosted environment form of C. >Aren't the standard library identifiers with external linkage reserved >even in a freestandinhg environment? How about "In a freestanding environment the name and type of the function called at program startup are implementation-defined. There are otherwise no reserved external identifiers". I read that as excluding the reservation of external identifiers defined in the library clause in a freestanding environment. What am I missing? Kurt -- | Kurt Watzka Phone : +49-89-2178-2781 | watzka@stat.uni-muenchen.de