From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,da85d9aaf769b16a
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Generic package parameters not externally visible : what's the
	rational ?
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 04:16:11 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <678f416b-c31b-4b51-88df-1e8917c111c0@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
References: <d31a3f23-975d-4ae7-954a-82055b50f172@31g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
	<wcciqe26w5q.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <hc7nfq$6o7$1@munin.nbi.dk>
	<10eygvuzeit9g.xwy2wanxoxgf$.dlg@40tude.net> <hca5gv$kvg$1@munin.nbi.dk>
	<1kf8mo4r9lqxg.1tdhqe6femt9m.dlg@40tude.net> <uljit6uwe.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
	<1r8etjwa9k46n.3pyj04jn686o$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <d72dedd2-ca21-4c1c-acde-16b7e86a482f@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
	<1trjf9wxhbsqb$.14uxfibpc7k8x$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <19ee7f4e-513a-4caf-9822-4610ff2155b2@m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
	<1ueb9d0h9nmm3$.11lt1wv42yxvt.dlg@40tude.net>
 <67b00f8a-3d12-48c9-ad5a-34980cf82e08@37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
	<11k5zsz6ne6n5$.ds2jp646tltk.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.198.58.176
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1257423371 3624 127.0.0.1 (5 Nov 2009 12:16:11
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:16:11 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.198.58.176;
	posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
	fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8997
Date: 2009-11-05T04:16:11-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 5 nov, 12:00, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de>
wrote:
> I am using "Generic_" because it is almost impossible to do anything
> otherwise if you have really many generics. And I do, because I have to.
Then, may be a point to discuss about : when using a "_Mixin" packages
(or "_Facet", after Rosen, this is the same), as a "_Mixin" package is
generic (this would not make sense otherwise), the "Generic_" prefix
may not be needed when the package is "_Mixin". Or perhaps
"_Mixin" (nor "_Facet") should not be used after-all, and only
"Generic_" should be (showing no difference between "_Mixin" and
others "Generic_").