From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Luke A. Guest <laguest@archeia.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Precisely why can't official FSF GNAT maintainers copy
 bug fixes in GNAT & its GCC-contained runtime en masse from GNAT GPL
 Community Edition?
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 13:44:53 +0100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <670085384.547216974.759926.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
References: <9c3a75d6-a01f-4cfa-9493-10b8b082ead8@googlegroups.com>
 <114db2c4-1e8c-4506-8d7c-df955dd9f808@googlegroups.com>
 <87d0yc1lsq.fsf@nightsong.com>
 <a181b4df-ceec-4d3e-8669-19ee8f268e56@googlegroups.com>
 <878t901jp4.fsf@nightsong.com>
 <bb2cbfdf-abb3-4b59-9ded-ce27bb98144b@googlegroups.com>
 <pchk2s$co5$1@dont-email.me>
 <lyr2mrz8mx.fsf@pushface.org>
 <pci51h$uir$2@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host: +TEya7EAJ4YbRpOzFfhRog.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3
Cancel-Lock: sha1:g5mJteRxK1ZPntDpaXVpAFPAE8U=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52006
Date: 2018-05-05T13:44:53+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Simon Clubley <clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP> wrote:

> Yes, that would be a far better way to put it, thanks.
> 
> What I was trying to say was that there are two distinct versions
> of the GNAT compiler and that changes are pushed in one direction only.

It’s more likely to be three branches with the CODE flowing like:

GNAT Pro -> GNAT GPL -> FSF GNAT