From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ca9eef4d5e2078ea
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Mark Bennison <mark.bennison@gecm.com>
Subject: GNORT information ( Was Re: Beware: Rep spec on an enumeration type
 causes code explosion )
Date: 1997/12/10
Message-ID: <66lpcm$ev9@gcsin3.geccs.gecm.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 296874937
References: <gwinn-0512972303070001@dh5055063.res.ray.com>
 <dewar.881402942@merv>
Organization: GEC-Marconi Radar & Defence Systems Ltd
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-12-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) wrote:
>In the case of GNAT, all code for such enumeration types with holes is
>generated by the compiler without reference to the runtime (this means
>that such types are fully supported by the new GNORT tecnology, which is
>GNAT with No RunTime, a version of GNAT for use in critical embedded
>applications which require certification).

Where can I find information on this GNORT stuff? I am currently involved in looking 
around for such a compiler ( we are currently considering Aonix's Raven but that is not 
yet available ). I have looked at both the GNAT and ACT europe web pages, checked the 
GNAT chat archives and performed an Alta Vista search which threw up nothing of 
relevance. Of course I may have missed something...

Thanks,

Mark.
-- 
Mark Bennison,           +-----------------------------------+
Technical Consultant,    | All opinions expressed are my own |
EASAMS Software Systems. +-----------------------------------+
"Death is a fickle hen, and random are her eggs" - Armando Iannucci