From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f15b862e11b575a4
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!d12g2000prj.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Air traffic control system in Java
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 00:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <66858c7c-8d7a-47da-958c-c55bc9b49a26@d12g2000prj.googlegroups.com>
References: <4d6ffe16$0$17930$a8266bb1@postbox2.readnews.com>
 <4d711c62$0$27719$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <fb2b8a6a-4f21-4d44-a5fa-635f1dc9994a@y14g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <4d712326$0$27719$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <c5e32f31-b93a-42ff-8131-9d79087af62d@s18g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
 <4d712b6a$0$17204$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <0b3daa32-8571-4a7f-a96f-cd876f4c4127@d12g2000prj.googlegroups.com>
 <4d712e64$0$17204$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <op.vrt1bgbnlzeukk@jellix.jlfencey.com>
 <1l023eg1ilrni.xwge3tgrabol$.dlg@40tude.net> <ikrhot$b9$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <woo1pfp61n08.kxkbvq7ayvif.dlg@40tude.net> <ikrmfp$bsq$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <iks2eo$5kl$1@munin.nbi.dk> <op.vrut7kb9lzeukk@jellix.jlfencey.com>
 <882b38e2-0eaa-4b2e-944c-692eca47908f@q12g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
 <op.vruzrrcrlzeukk@jellix.jlfencey.com>
 <vgy227ts0adx.7bnk9h3ltwc0$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 174.28.182.16
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1299312871 23642 127.0.0.1 (5 Mar 2011 08:14:31
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 08:14:31 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: d12g2000prj.googlegroups.com; posting-host=174.28.182.16;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14)
 Gecko/20110218 Firefox/3.6.14 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0E),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18846
Date: 2011-03-05T00:14:30-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mar 5, 1:07=A0am, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de>
wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 08:15:17 +0100, Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
> > Shark8 wrote:
>
> >> Given that the VCL is basically an object-oriented wrapper of the
> >> Windows [graphics] API
>
> > And still, a lot of regular users are /not/ satisfied with what the VCL
> > offers. And it's already huge (thus, nothing I would put in a standards
> > document).
>
> Very true, we are such a user. VCL is a constant headache to use [to us].
>
> (The problems begin when the customer sends you exact requirements on the
> UI's look and feel.)
>
> --
> Regards,
> Dmitry A. Kazakovhttp://www.dmitry-kazakov.de

So, is the complaint you have not with th VCL per se but with the
demand
that the look-and-feel be the same?