From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:fb43:: with SMTP id b3mr19902683qvq.187.1570362320733;
        Sun, 06 Oct 2019 04:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:750d:: with SMTP id q13mr13306910oic.99.1570362320463;
 Sun, 06 Oct 2019 04:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!o24no1761042qtl.0!news-out.google.com!q23ni132qtl.1!nntp.google.com!o24no1761038qtl.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 04:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <96d5218a-2714-40dd-988d-10c7d27a96a2@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=72.89.41.181;
 posting-account=s89PEgoAAABHs2ETFyOrCeTQVQJAfzKq
NNTP-Posting-Host: 72.89.41.181
References: <1c12f540-00b8-4be8-bfc6-13ad31d9916c@googlegroups.com>
 <96d5218a-2714-40dd-988d-10c7d27a96a2@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <665a8b5e-533e-4df6-a1c1-7a4c257ea277@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT: no visible subprogram matches the specification for "Put"
From: marciant@earthlink.net
Injection-Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2019 11:45:20 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1804
X-Received-Body-CRC: 595289961
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:57253
Date: 2019-10-06T04:45:20-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I think that both are: both the one that can be passed a string and the one that 
can be passed an integer.  I thing that the "test signature" procedure at least 
shows that the string one and the put_line one should be visible because it
runs as expected and the string one is the one that GNAT is complaining about.
I am thinking that GNAT's compilation - and my subsequent running - of the
Signature test program would imply that?  Do you agree?