From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.237.61.141 with SMTP id i13mr916517qtf.50.1477406045865; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 07:34:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.10.98 with SMTP id 89mr3926144otg.3.1477406045833; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 07:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!g49no211749qtc.1!news-out.google.com!f59ni408qtb.1!nntp.google.com!y38no397426qta.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 07:34:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6188b81f-7d6a-4ea4-90d4-74142471d979@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=185.30.132.97; posting-account=hya6vwoAAADTA0O27Aq3u6Su3lQKpSMz NNTP-Posting-Host: 185.30.132.97 References: <7eaadf74-c55f-4c00-8f13-bf027cce130e@googlegroups.com> <6188b81f-7d6a-4ea4-90d4-74142471d979@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <66082e27-14ca-45d1-b8ff-7fe825cd2687@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: LLVM and Ada From: Vincent Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:34:05 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:32175 Date: 2016-10-25T07:34:05-07:00 List-Id: Le samedi 22 octobre 2016 14:51:36 UTC+2, Lucretia a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: > [...] start by generating the bindings with "gcc -fdump-ada-spec-slim" an= d then hand massage them ... Yes it's an alternative I have to consider. =20 > Whatever binding you create, don't release them under GPL, pick something= less restrictive and other's will use them. Really annoys me when people c= reate a binding to something and then puts them under a license the origina= l library wasn't released under. I totally agree ! The binding should be under the same licence. Thank you Luke. Regards, Vincent