From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fe7b178ffa3708a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-25 11:57:38 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: rleif@rleif.com (Robert C. Leif)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Omission in the Ada Standard
Date: 25 Sep 2003 11:57:36 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <657ea3e3.0309251057.7363a9d8@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.105.82.40
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1064516257 1556 127.0.0.1 (25 Sep 2003 18:57:37
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Sep 2003 18:57:37 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:42919
Date: 2003-09-25T18:57:37+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

This should be Re: Omission in the Ada Standard. However, neither the
original nor Mr. Kilgallen's reply have appeared on the Google news
reader, which will not transmit with the Re:

Larry Kilgallen stated, "And what would the meaning be on some other
processor for which a standard-compliant Ada compiler is needed?"

If a CPU does NOT have ports, the part(s) of the compiler specific for
ports do not have to be implemented.

Bob Leif
Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
rleif@rleif.com
www.newportinstruments.com