From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!sei!ajpo!taft
From: taft@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu (Tucker Taft)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: AdaSAGE
Summary: Standard Ada/SQL binding
Keywords: AdaSAGE, Ada, SQL, Relational DBMS
Message-ID: <653@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu>
Date: 7 Feb 90 20:00:07 GMT
References: <94342@linus.UUCP>
Distribution: comp.lang.ada
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <94342@linus.UUCP>, samuels@chance.uucp (Michael Samuels) writes:
>. . . just because no standard Ada/SQL binding exists.  Any
> comments?  

An ANSI standard Ada/SQL binding does exist, using the
SQL Module language.  Furthermore, Marc Graham at the SEI
(marc@sei.cmu.edu) is in the process of defining
a more user/Ada friendly standard Ada/SQL binding
with full approval of AJPO, and hopefully ultimate
international standardization.  This binding is called 
"SAME" (SQL/Ada Module Extensions).

S. Tucker Taft
Intermetrics, Inc.
Cambridge, MA  02138   stt%inmet@uunet.uu.net  taft@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu
(617) 661-1840