From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e7992c59d4c134e9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-03-23 14:24:42 PST
Path: 
 sparky!uunet!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!ra!mimsy!alex
From: alex@cs.umd.edu (Alex Blakemore)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: The Economist says: US Military software in 8th place
Message-ID: <65388@mimsy.umd.edu>
Date: 23 Mar 93 21:54:10 GMT
References: <SRCTRAN.93Mar23001245@world.std.com>
Sender: news@mimsy.umd.edu
Distribution: comp.lang.ada,comp.software-eng
Organization: U of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Science, Coll. Pk., MD 20742
Date: 1993-03-23T21:54:10+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <SRCTRAN.93Mar23001245@world.std.com> srctran@world.std.com (Gregory Aharonian) writes:
> 		TABLE OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING PRODUCTIVITY (1991)
 
> 	MIS SOFTWARE		SYSTEMS SOFTWARE	MILITARY SOFTWARE
> 1	America			Japan			France
  .
  .
  .
> 8	Norway			South Korea		AMERICA

correct me if I am wrong, but hasn't France embraced Ada while much
of America's DoD is still resisting it every step of the way?
-- 
---------------------------------------------------
Alex Blakemore alex@cs.umd.edu   NeXT mail accepted