From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,314d661a32522d8a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Announcement: GNAT ported to LLVM
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:25:16 +0100
Message-ID: <6523k7F2dv208U1@mid.individual.net>
References: 
 <ec1ce33f-ee8f-4bf7-a1bc-ef1e269dcc40@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
 <87iqzco4n7.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net>
 <7e6246de-2ac0-4311-8047-ae88ea4ccb38@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
 <76f13aae-d11f-4ffa-b4d1-ad3d597598d8@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
 <e56b77a8-eb38-432f-abbe-895100206bed@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
 <651j49F2eaafuU1@mid.individual.net>
 <04e55b5c-37b7-4dab-84e9-b548cb597a68@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: individual.net AP44BMjFwn6D7zn0lWGgfQVQkJfDTMnPWkNDC9ovtBbf9LXA8=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/db4ElNfZHSo778h4nkgKkjcWUM=
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.5
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20607
Date: 2008-03-27T18:25:16+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

baldrick wrote:

>> I thought that -gnatN was even more aggressive than -gnatn.
> 
> My understanding is that -gnatN was essentially a workaround for
> various historical limitations of the gcc inliner, most of which
> no longer exist.  I've been told by ACT that -gnatN is deprecated
> on the x86.  Personally I never bother with it.

Good to know.