From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.36.10.4 with SMTP id 4mr4740585itw.40.1510267965897;
        Thu, 09 Nov 2017 14:52:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.0.7 with SMTP id 7mr286279ota.14.1510267965806; Thu, 09
 Nov 2017 14:52:45 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!l196no714363itl.0!news-out.google.com!193ni2027iti.0!nntp.google.com!l196no714359itl.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:52:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ou2hsj$11vt$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2003:c7:83c6:b000:e052:61fc:5a53:d240;
 posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2003:c7:83c6:b000:e052:61fc:5a53:d240
References: <6a5368c5-f015-4dcb-9291-e77b40fa1bf1@googlegroups.com>
 <wcc4lq7does.fsf@TheWorld.com> <otrr5u$1rqv$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <wccd14so07t.fsf@TheWorld.com> <ou14r2$49s$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <39330489-ec8b-481f-bcff-a5b7d1a2d8e3@googlegroups.com>
 <ou21f3$1bo$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <7c68eace-8a03-4bfc-806d-aa78a453f97f@googlegroups.com>
 <ou2cdt$mtf$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <ee798e4a-621c-452c-94b0-2905ecfb3cb9@googlegroups.com>
 <ou2hsj$11vt$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <651d0899-c38f-47f3-8f47-39fe726bc256@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: some trivial questions?
From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Injection-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 22:52:45 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Body-CRC: 817704141
X-Received-Bytes: 2542
Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48793
Date: 2017-11-09T14:52:45-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Am Donnerstag, 9. November 2017 22:38:31 UTC+1 schrieb Dmitry A. Kazakov:
> On 2017-11-09 22:11, AdaMagica wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 9. November 2017 21:05:21 UTC+1 schrieb Dmitry A. Kazakov:
> >> Also why should
> >>
> >>      with A.B.C.D;
> >>
> >> imply
> >>
> >>      with A, A.B, A.B.C;
> > 
> > Do you think it shouldn't?
> 
> No. Likewise
> 
>     use A.B.C;
> 
> should imply
> 
>     with [<prefix>,] [<prefix>.]A, [<prefix>.]A.B, [<prefix>.]A.B.C;
> 
I do not understand. You don't want "with A.B" to imply "with A", but you want "use A.B" to imply "use A"?

> > Children have direct visibility of their ancestors' visible part.
> > So why shouldn't "with A.B" imply "with A"?
> Playing devil's advocate, why visibility of A.B in C should imply that D 
> depends on A.B when D has "with A.B.C;"
Then C depends on A.B, so if D depends on A.B.C, it also depends on A.B.