From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ADDR_WS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 16 Jan 92 00:06:25 GMT
From: sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!emx.utexas.edu@hplabs.hpl.hp.com  (David 
A. Hasan)
Subject: generic subprogs. in a package
Message-ID: <65114@ut-emx.uucp>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

OK, I give up.  I can't figure out why the DEC compiler is rejecting
the following package spec.  Can anyone point out the obvious thing
I must be overlooking?


PACKAGE test IS
  PROCEDURE f;
  FUNCTION f RETURN Integer;

  GENERIC 
    n : Boolean;
  FUNCTION f RETURN Integer;
END test;


---DEC compiler diagnostics:


    6 	  GENERIC 
..........1
%ADAC-E-REDECLERR, (1) Illegal redeclaration of procedure specification f at 
        line 2 [LRM 8.3(17)]


--David A. Hasan
--  Center for Space Research
--  University of Texas at Austin