From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.66.122.69 with SMTP id lq5mr8328350pab.17.1392567988538; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 08:26:28 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.183.3.41 with SMTP id bt9mr159706obd.0.1392567988359; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 08:26:28 -0800 (PST) Path: border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog3.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!c10no25155933igq.0!news-out.google.com!h8ni16igy.0!nntp.google.com!c10no25155915igq.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 08:26:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=201.95.3.197; posting-account=TRgI1QoAAABSsYi-ox3Pi6N-JEKKU0cu NNTP-Posting-Host: 201.95.3.197 References: <215f6df2-a7ec-42f4-ac82-656d5b12bf61@googlegroups.com> <8383f5d6-3f66-415b-ab3f-8801fa377a6b@googlegroups.com> <8200939f-9bbd-44dd-848c-00c663f37121@googlegroups.com> <1e41e2d6-7ff8-445d-9c14-14c49b244bcf@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <64d96ab9-ef9e-46b1-ac3b-3924766abaf6@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Best representation for spares From: "Rego, P." Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 16:26:28 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Original-Bytes: 2157 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:184922 Date: 2014-02-16T08:26:28-08:00 List-Id: On Sunday, February 16, 2014 10:40:11 AM UTC-3, Rego, P. wrote: > I did not get. Is is better to use > Auxiliary_Peripherals_Register_Map: > Auxiliary_Peripherals_Register_Map_Type > := (others => <>); > or just initialize in system initialization? > (or both?) Now I guess RPi board talked to me :-) I tried to use both approaches joint and separately, and in all initialization attempts from definition I got an raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow (or erroneous memory access) which only was resolved when I removed both initializations kinds. So it seems to be safer to initialize the registers in run-time, inside a specific initialize procedure.