From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,59d24b21703c2885
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Dale Stanbrough <dale@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Use of constants on EFA
Date: 1997/11/12
Message-ID: <64bip0$6g6$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 289502566
Distribution: world
References: <63qkmc$8va$1@uttwil.bodensee.com>
 <01bceece$4a6a85e0$423c63c3@default> <64ahc0$dk1@top.mitre.org>
 <34690D2D.6721@hello.confusion.nl>
X-XXMessage-ID: <B08F99980F031035@sambar.cs.rmit.edu.au>
Organization: RMIT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-11-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Please note that the EF Programmers Manual has both a copyright and a
NATO
 security classification associated with it and as such its subject matter
 should not be discussed within this forum."


Yes, I can well imagine the Iraqi's taking advantage of the fact that
variables that don't vary haven't been labelled constants.


Dale