From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,59d24b21703c2885
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: mfb@mbunix.mitre.org (Michael F Brenner)
Subject: Re: Use of constants on EFA
Date: 1997/11/11
Message-ID: <64ahc0$dk1@top.mitre.org>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 288701737
References: <63qkmc$8va$1@uttwil.bodensee.com>
 <01bceece$4a6a85e0$423c63c3@default>
Organization: The MITRE Corporation
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-11-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


That is very interesting, to classify the programming standards. Why
did you decide to do that? How can those standards be reviewed and
commented on by independent authority? How can you program economically
without public light? This is the first time I have seen a methodology
for coding given a security classification. Again, very interesting.