From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.182.85.170 with SMTP id i10mr3680946obz.36.1415809822990; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:30:22 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.19.193 with SMTP id 59mr22848qgh.19.1415809822962; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:30:22 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!hl2no584388igb.0!news-out.google.com!u1ni9qah.0!nntp.google.com!u7no1116915qaz.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:30:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20141112162323.2f15556f@atmarama.ddns.net> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=50.250.123.221; posting-account=yiWntAoAAAC1KqC_shmxJYv07B9l6LNU NNTP-Posting-Host: 50.250.123.221 References: <87fvdr2vdv.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> <54609F34.4080201@spam.spam> <35f01472-3510-4f67-8765-006fa8591c35@googlegroups.com> <9tc8w.73007$ZT5.37595@fx07.iad> <22a3816a-4e89-48f0-a126-dce581781beb@googlegroups.com> <084b1934-9641-425e-85ec-293e0334413e@googlegroups.com> <86bf69c8-eb08-4696-b6c9-3784f5c42213@googlegroups.com> <87389olqie.fsf@ixod.org> <20141112130615.5df2350a@atmarama.ddns.net> <041be681-f329-47cd-b98a-9da37e04db45@googlegroups.com> <20141112162323.2f15556f@atmarama.ddns.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <6471665c-174e-4dbc-afcf-03b8a0e9755b@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: What exactly is the licensing situation with GNAT? From: David Botton Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:30:22 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:23175 Date: 2014-11-12T08:30:22-08:00 List-Id: > How would that go along with desktop clients? Gnoga uses the same code base for desktop, web or mobile. On desktop and android/ios instead of websockets it is possible to just get= a direct hook in to the webkit/ie/gecko engine and talk direct. I have som= e concept code for webkit on Mac and ie and tested a few methods for gecko = (XULRunner). It is a lower priority for the moment since can run on all tho= se platforms with websockets now. > Ada looks as capable as all other so called > 'modern' languages both in terms of features and performance as well I believe more so :) David Botton