From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,8ae637be9dba997 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,8ae637be9dba997 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: rlove@antispam.neosoft.com (Robert B. Love ) Subject: Re: IDE/Rational Apex experiences Date: 1997/11/10 Message-ID: <6460f3$k4g$1@uuneo.neosoft.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 288216453 References: <6429gb$5qh@dfw-ixnews12.ix.netcom.com> Organization: NeoSoft, Inc. Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++ Date: 1997-11-10T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In <6429gb$5qh@dfw-ixnews12.ix.netcom.com> "bklungle" wrote: > At a certain large AeroSpace company, use of Rational Apex was mandated by > management. There are 27 programmers trying to develop a very large ground > based processing system using C and C++. When 4 users log onto the Rational > Apex system, the response time on the network increases to around 20 > minutes. The system HAS been optimized about as much as the Gurus know how. While there are valid criticisms you can make about Apex this sounds like your network is at fault. At my aerospace employer we have over 80 apex users. When the network works its a wonder, when it doesn't we get the performance you describe. Note the key factor is the network and its resources. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Bob Love MIME & NeXT Mail OK rlove@neosoft.com PGP key available ----------------------------------------------------------------