From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,a28d031ddb8d985f X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!f18g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Anh Vo Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: First successful build gnat/gcc-4.4.1 on MinGW without modification needed Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:19:02 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <645eb42f-1907-46c3-8613-b83626571f78@f18g2000prf.googlegroups.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 149.32.224.34 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1248977943 6640 127.0.0.1 (30 Jul 2009 18:19:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: f18g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=149.32.224.34; posting-account=Qh2kiQoAAADpCLlhT_KTYoGO8dU3n4I6 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; GTB5; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7462 Date: 2009-07-30T11:19:02-07:00 List-Id: On Jul 30, 10:17=A0am, Yannick Duch=EAne Hibou57 wrote: > On 30 juil, 18:08, Anh Vo wrote: > > > For the first time GNAT / GCC-4.4.1 is built successfully without any > > modification needed. In addition, the installation went smoothly, too. > > I have been testing it since. It has performed great so far. In some > > cases it performs far more better than previous version. I will have > > another update when the testing is complete. > > > Anh Vo > > Hello Anh, > > Do you mean MinGW on Windows ? > > Some months ago, I successfully built a GNAT too with WinMW and mSys, > but as mSys lacks symbolic links (althought this would be possible on > Windows XP, this would break compatibility of mSys with Windows 95), > and so I had to modify some shell command in multiple files. Yes, I meant MinGW on Windows XP. Before gcc-4.4.1 the build was always broken due to one or more problems.