From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,914be3dbe7922d54,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-05 09:05:21 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: fmattison@ssd5.nrl.navy.mil (Frank Mattison) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Elaboration in Detached Process Date: 5 Jun 2003 09:05:21 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <6449213e.0306050805.3d143731@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 132.250.166.182 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1054829121 26622 127.0.0.1 (5 Jun 2003 16:05:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Jun 2003 16:05:21 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38693 Date: 2003-06-05T16:05:21+00:00 List-Id: Has anyone experienced this problem, when running Ada 83 (OpenVMS) detached? In the following example Data_Ptr initializes correctly when running as an interactive process. But when running as a detached process, this initialization raises an exception when the procedure is called: procedure XYZ(Data_Format : in Data_Formats) is Data_Ptr : Data_Ptrs := new Data_Types(Data_Format); begin ... There are other cases where the elaboration seems to fail when the process is switched to detached. Does anyone have a suggestion as to how to handle this? Thanks, Frank Mattison