From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e0a833839e226c98 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Ludovic Brenta Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Debian GNU/kFreeBSD (was: Missing Ada components in Ubuntu) Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 03:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <643d34e5-6c65-43bf-b30d-f28d472e1ddd@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> References: <5c7f95fb-8fe8-4abb-bdcc-f0c8731a9f59@q27g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <6456fec7-4037-4ca4-bf99-edcac7b26e3d@b5g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <483A7F05.2050901@gmail.com> <1956f353-d5b4-4d07-99f9-5c32ed04c88f@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <483ABDF7.3070809@gmail.com> <13395907-e8cc-4858-93ac-bd7bd0d6ac31@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <483BD9D6.7030203@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 153.98.68.197 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1211882811 18263 127.0.0.1 (27 May 2008 10:06:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 10:06:51 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=153.98.68.197; posting-account=pcLQNgkAAAD9TrXkhkIgiY6-MDtJjIlC User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.3) Gecko/20040924,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:390 Date: 2008-05-27T03:06:51-07:00 List-Id: S=E9bastien wrote: > > OK, maybe I'll start looking chauvinistic, but have you checked > > http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/ ? > > Yes I knew this project, but I wonder why, do you have any idea, why > using gnu over freebsd kernel, and using plain freebsd distributions > instead? Because Debian is a binary distribution (binary packages) whereas the FreeBSD ports collection is a source distribution (you must recompile everything from source). This is especially valuable if you run out of time to compile everything. Because the existing Ada packages in Debian are better than those in FreeBSD. This is especially valuable if you run out of time to do your own packaging. Because the FreeBSD kernel is more stable and better engineered than the Linux kernel. This is especially valuable if you run out of time to tweak your drivers. I'm not advocating Debian GNU/kFreeBSD, only giving a few subjective reasons why some might choose it. -- Ludovic Brenta.