From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,4873305131bf4d94
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4873305131bf4d94
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,4873305131bf4d94
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
From: kaz@helios.crest.nt.com (Kaz Kylheku)
Subject: Re: Porting Experiences (was Ada and Pascal etc )
Date: 1997/11/08
Message-ID: <6424pb$rrh$1@helios.crest.nt.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 288467198
References: <34557f2b.1934172@news.mindspring.com>
 <63tq2h$b6o@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net> <346382BD.25F8@gsg.eds.com>
 <640ena$1q8@mtinsc04.worldnet.att.net>
Organization: A poorly-installed InterNetNews site
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
Date: 1997-11-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <640ena$1q8@mtinsc04.worldnet.att.net>,
Craig Franck  <clfranck@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Show me a macro assembler that's more maintainable than C. (I 
>currently have MASM 6.1 and several hundred megabytes of C and
>asm code on my system that proves you wrong.)

You forgot to mention that 90% of the assembly won't even assemble.

Heh heh.
-- 
"In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be
indented six feet downward and covered with dirt."
	-- Blair P. Houghton