From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e0507ace077eca70
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: nospam@somewhere.ia.us (Robert S. White)
Subject: Re: Address attribute
Date: 1997/11/07
Message-ID: <63tros$grg$1@flood.weeg.uiowa.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 288180293
References: <345FD3FB.74A32F4A@academic.truman.edu>
 <63p32j$fr2$1@flood.weeg.uiowa.edu>
 <mheaney-ya023680000511970727050001@news.ni.net>
Organization: designing/implementing avionics during the day
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-11-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <mheaney-ya023680000511970727050001@news.ni.net>, mheaney@ni.net 
says...

>Why treat the syntax of address specification any different?  The syntax
>was indeed changed in Ada 95, and the form above has been deprecated.

  You are absolutely right Matthew, and I am still stuck in Ada 83
land ;-/   I really need to live and breath Ada 95 some more before
I help others on the usenet.  Mea culpa.

_____________________________________________________________________
Robert S. White         -- An embedded systems software engineer
e-mail reply to reverse of: ia us lib cedar-rapids crpl shift2 whiter