From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c5052684d3523ff1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: ig25@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Thomas Koenig)
Subject: Re: GNAT 3.07 MsDos/DJGPP bug report to whom?
Date: 1997/10/22
Message-ID: <62lnnk$gv2@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 282498813
References: <swhalenEIFp53.946@netcom.com>
Reply-To: Thomas.Koenig@ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de
X-Complaints-To: usenet@nz12.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de
X-Trace: nz12.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de 877552187 7667 (None) 129.13.110.243
Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Universit=E4t_Karlsruhe_(TH),_Germany_?=
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-10-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In comp.lang.ada, swhalen@netcom.com (Steve Whalen) wrote:

>(assuming that someone even attempts to port GNAT 3.10 to MsDos)

One group which might take up that task is the egcs group
(http://www.cygnus.com/egcs/).  I don't know wether anybody is working
on an MS-DOS version of egcs, and there's only been some very prelimiary
work of integrating GNAT 3.10.  Still, it won't hurt to ask.

The main problem of porting GNAT to egcs is the lack of a good test
suite.  Anybody care to donate one? :-)
-- 
Thomas Koenig, Thomas.Koenig@ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de, ig25@dkauni2.bitnet.
Harrassing E-Mail may be posted.  If you don't like to see that, don't
send me E-Mail.