From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,aea4cc77526f5e4a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.germany.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Alex R. Mosteo" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:15:36 +0100 Message-ID: <62ioosF225mfpU1@mid.individual.net> References: <7xJvj.7420$Ru4.4246@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net> <5b9wj.4639$Mh2.1432@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com> <5Ekwj.10401$0o7.6822@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net> <%Ntwj.12620$Ch6.11402@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net> <62ic8uF230f4oU1@mid.individual.net> Reply-To: alejandro@mosteo.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net Hc0g1AS1v6KQOYL6bNZ7SQ4qao/9aWi1apDKq0B7ULjh18jdI= Cancel-Lock: sha1:ryoL4bC/OVKT3l4Mm+5X9My6W+M= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) In-Reply-To: Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20092 Date: 2008-02-26T16:15:36+01:00 List-Id: adaworks@sbcglobal.net wrote: > The argument from C++ programmers use to be, "We don't have > such problems if we are careful ..." "... if we are good programmers ..." > "... if we follow good practices ..." Of course C/C++ with the transitive, low level #include mechanism are even in a worse situation.