From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.204.130.7 with SMTP id q7mr1659064bks.2.1345561563797;
        Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.24.165 with SMTP id v5mr2506571wif.1.1345561563314;
        Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 m12ni123259bkm.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!7no33177620wig.0!news-out.google.com!n2ni243907953win.0!nntp.google.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec?
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:06:22 +0200
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <62h5nifarvom.1myeqdyevhefq.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <sgy28ka2rw0a.119txios2lu0g$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502bd3e6$0$6574$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <17qgsq5y7or0v.16z18fmcew1lt$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502c149e$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <ak8h9w7770bx$.ncrikznng6v3$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502cd701$0$6568$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <pstv4iafyysv$.1mq6dicsj9my0.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502d3c68$0$6572$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <mhbnq53dwqt2.r7w4k1ptmxf1$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502e9039$0$6557$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <40tmogy4d1b5.1kc2gm8qfrkdu.dlg@40tude.net>
 <503240ed$0$6569$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <ciztlfv7tfhf$.taw9f39y1oa4$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <50326457$0$6576$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <1qril0ny3eczr$.1vlhpbrjyyb8k.dlg@40tude.net>
 <503375ac$0$6565$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <1vglgit7vnu4l$.2ytljabrhk2.dlg@40tude.net>
 <5033986c$0$6573$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: FbOMkhMtVLVmu7IwBnt1tw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-08-21T17:06:22+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:17:19 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote:

> On 21.08.12 15:12, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:

>> Maybe, there is something wrong with XML itself?
> 
> So far, I have not read a substantiated argument in this discussion,
> about how transformations of XML documents will show what is wrong
> with XML. Not even a more general comment about a procedure that
> allows integrating runs of different compilers.

"Transformation of XML documents" does not look like a practical problem to
make substantial arguments about, it looks like a solution for a problem
yet to be stated, of which existence is in question, so far.

>> using intentionally vague language and refuse
>> to consider practical or formalized cases.
> 
> I did. It's just that your examples fell short of saying almost
> the same things but by sticking with partial results, I think,
> drawing, quite generally, no conclusion.

I presented no examples at all. How could I, if XML has no use in my eyes?
It is up to XML proponents to put up cases they think XML might be useful
for. Explain the criteria, show the methodic, compare to competing
solutions.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de